Sergio Adan Bermudez

Physics · the subject of my PhD

One photon or two

Two-photon excitation is a quadratic effect, and that one square changes everything: where light acts, how deep it reaches, and how precisely it can treat tissue. Move the sliders; the optics are computed live.

01 · The focus

Gaussian beam in water

Same lens, two very different glows

One-photon excitation of a molecule at 400 nm, and two-photon excitation of the same transition at 800 nm, focused by the same objective. Seen from the side, as a camera would.

one-photon · 400 nm · ∝ I

two-photon · 800 nm · ∝ I²

0.50
excitation per plane along the axis (normalised)±10 µm around the focus

Why the cone glows for one photon. The same power crosses every plane of the beam, and one-photon excitation is linear in intensity, so every plane is excited equally: the glow fills the whole hourglass.

Why only the focus glows for two. Excitation per plane follows intensity squared integrated over the spot, which falls as 1/w². It is confined to about two Rayleigh ranges: axial sectioning without a pinhole.

The waist trade-off. At the same NA the 800 nm spot is twice as wide, but squaring the intensity narrows the excitation by √2. The gain is not lateral sharpness; it is that nothing outside the focus is excited.

w₀ = λ / (π·NA) is the paraxial Gaussian estimate; z_R = π·w₀²·n / λ with n = 1.33. At high NA the paraxial model is approximate.

02 · Penetration

the optical window

Why near-infrared reaches deeper

Below about 600 nm, blood absorption and scattering stop light within a short distance. Between roughly 600 and 1300 nm sits tissue's optical window. Fluence falls as exp(−z/δ).

relative fluence and excitation against depthpublished δ values

A subtlety worth knowing: two-photon excitation follows fluence squared, so its depth signal decays twice as fast as the 800 nm light itself (δ/2 ≈ 3.3 mm here), similar to 630 nm one-photon light. Its advantage at depth is not more signal; it is that the excitation stays confined to the focus, wherever that focus is placed.

δ values: 630 nm ≈ 4.0 mm (brain-tumour tissue phantom, μ_eff 0.25 mm⁻¹); 750 to 800 nm ≈ 6.6 mm (breast tissue, μ_eff ≈ 1.5 cm⁻¹). Real tissue varies widely.

03 · Photodynamic therapy

illustrative model

Treating a tumour without touching what is above it

In photodynamic therapy a photosensitiser collects in the tumour; light excites it, and its triplet state makes singlet oxygen, which kills nearby cells. The same molecule, the same 1270 nm glow as the lab agent's experiment.

singlet-oxygen dose, accumulatingtissue section 12 × 8 mm
tumour dose reached0%
dose to healthy tissue above it, as % of tumour dose–

Standard PDT illuminates everything in the beam, so healthy tissue above the tumour, and the skin most of all, receives dose wherever photosensitiser is present. Two-photon PDT scans a focus through the tumour and excites only there. Its practical limits are real: it needs femtosecond lasers, and most photosensitisers absorb two photons weakly, which is why new high-cross-section molecules are an active research area.

Model: photosensitiser 1.0 in tumour, 0.35 elsewhere; 630 nm δ = 4.0 mm; 800 nm δ = 6.6 mm with excitation ∝ fluence²; focus drawn at 0.12 mm for visibility (a real two-photon focal volume is around 1 µm³ and is scanned). It shows the principle, not a dosimetry calculation.

Sources